Salman Rushdie Indian Visit: He Have Every Right to Come India

I was also listening live TV (find link bellow) by mistake (because I do not like to watch TV). For me no any writer or writing should be ban. Salman Rushdi have every right to come India.

And this is also shows that the Salman have ability to challenge the particular belief and at least he challenged that. I did not read his writing but tomorrow onwards I will try to find his writing and will read that.

One of my Muslim friend from JNU said that he also write about "other religion like Hindu in same manner," (he said the he read some of his work).

I would also like to ask intellectual like Sheeba Aslam Fehmi and my other Muslim friends that why there are no religious reform in Islam like Christianity, Hinduism etc? (My knowledge is limited and I do not know about religious reform movement in Islam except by Mustafa Kamal Pasha.)

I would also like to ask Sheeba Aslam Fehmi that was it not the regions fundamentalism that your house was attacked around two months ago by (by Jama Masjid, Delhi head Bukhari as media and you claimed)?

http://khabar.ibnlive.in.com//news/65785/1

(It was telecaster at IBN7 TV at 1.00PM-145PM on Tuesday, Jan 17, 2012

Dipak Mishra a new Supreme Court Judge: A Hidden Meaning

He was Chef Justice earlier in Delhi High Court, who gave judgement against reservation policy in Delhi University. May be other judgement against policy meant for social justice.


Matter of OBC - I see his appointment as a part of future plan of bigger conspiracy. Like last five years, the anti reservation forces will go to Supreme Court next year, and again thy will try to stall the social justice through reservation. This game will be easy because they got another anti social justice judge through reservation. 


Matter of SCs & STs - This appointment became also an important because the case for put Creamy Layer among SCs and STs are also pending in Supreme Court.


Matter of Reservation in Private Sector of SC ST OBC - Forget about implementation, anti social justice forces will go to Supreme Court even if Govt. show the political promise or intention to implement it. Recently Parliamentary Committee gave report to Govt. of India in which they recommend that STs and STs should give quota in Railway tenders. Another Committee recommended to give quota to STs and STs in Govt. tenders. Is it heard to imagine what he will do if these kinds of cases will goes to him? Or what he will do when he became chief justice of India? 


Hiding their Bias Thought - In Judgement of June 3rd 2011 against OBC reservation Chief Justice wrote these notes, which is also important -
1. [... ...]
2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?................................ No
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?..... No
Why this judgement should not be reported in Digest? Because after some years Dalit-Bahujan can not know who delivered what, on the issue of social justice. 


Dilip Mandal wrote on his Facebook wall - दिल्ली यूनिवर्सिटी एडमिशन में OBC आरक्षण के खिलाफ फैसला देने वाले हाई कोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस दीपक मिश्रा प्रमोट होकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जज बनाए गए हैं। वे अगले सात साल तक सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जज रहेंगे और उनके चीफ जस्टिस बनने की संभावना है। यहां उनका वह चर्चित जजमेंट पढ़िए।.... कुछ ही दिनों बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दीपक मिश्रा के बनाए कानून को गलत करार दिया।.... मायावती ने कल प्रधानमंत्री को चिट्ठी लिखकर न्यायपालिका में आरक्षण की मांग की है। (cf. #Dilip Mandal, Facebook post of 2011 10 02)


The person who delivered judgement against reservation became Judge of Supreme court! So which kind merit is needed is to be a judge of Supreme Court? This is how Hindu system, Ved, Puran, Gita, Manu-Smrity etc is working. Thanks to Lord Macaulay and Internet. Who empowered us. 




Are we Weak - Yes our society is weak to fight these cases and discrimination. But now our society have also many enlighten and scholar person who can trap their conspiracy, and can fight. We know we will win but they will delay to make us few more years as sufferer. 
But any how
People Unites: Shall Always be Victorious. And now we are united.


URL of related primary sources -



Judgement, Dipak Mishra, Chief Justice, Delhi HC on OBC reservation
http://www.du.ac.in/fileadmin/DU/students/Pdf/admissions/2011/UG/DMA03062011LPA212011.pdf

ST ST quota in Government tenders
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/sc-st-quota-in-govt-tenders-on-cards/791517/


ST ST quota in Government tenders
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sc-st-quota-in-govt-tenders-on-cards/791517/


ST SC quota in Railway tender
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-09-07/news/30123136_1_parliamentary-panel-catering-services-st-quota


Mayawati wants quota in Judiciary
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/Maya-wants-quota-even-in-judiciary/articleshow/10201897.cms


Paswan wnats quota in private sector
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/paswan-bats-for-quota-in-pvt-sector-judicia/815311/

Brahmanwadi Layers who wanted the equal society by opposing social justice
https://www.facebook.com/zanil7/posts/196712543735600

Culture of Anti Reservation P P Rao and Indiresan

Culture of Anti Reservation / Anti Social Justice P P Rao and Indiresan

यह पता चला है कि सर्वोच्च न्यायलय के जाने मने वकील पीपी राव, अपने पोते के उपनयन संकार कल उनके निवास नोयडा में करवाने जा रहें है. याद हो कि उपनयन संस्कार ब्राह्मणों में बच्चो की ब्राह्मण धर्म -दीक्षा और ब्रह्मण बनाने की विधि है. हिंदू धर्म के अनुसार यह मन जाता है, कि ब्राह्मण जन्मजात पैदा नहीं होता बल्कि वह उपनयन के पश्चात ब्राह्मण घोषित होता है. यह उपनयन सस्कार सिर्फ और सिर्फ ब्राह्मनी के पेट से पैदा हुए पुत्र के लिए ही सिमित होता है. यह संकार ब्राह्मण के अलावा दूसरे लोग जैसे शूद्र को करने पर हिंदू धर्म में शक्त मनाही है. यह संकार को वेदों के पुरुष शुक्त से सम्बंधित माना जाता है. पुरुष शुक्त भारत में असमता की जननी और असमानता का स्रोत है. डा. आंबेडकर के हिसाब से भारत में यह असमानता का सबसे बड़ा कारन है. अब यहाँ महत्पूर्ण होगा कि पीपी राव ने P. V. Indiresan केस में सर्वोच्च न्यायलय में OBC आरक्षण विरोधी केस में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका अदा की है. यहाँ तक कि मुक़दमा उनके पक्ष में करने के लिए जजो को बदलने की कोशिस भी कि है. यह महाशय घोर सामाजिक न्याय विरोधी है. अब यह अपने अपने पोते को ब्राह्मण बनाने जा रहे है. यही महाशय न्यायमूर्ति दिनाकरन जो दलित समाज से आते है उनके खिलाफ जांच समिति के सदस्य थे और दिनाकरन ने इन्हें समिति से हटाने के लिए एक यचिका दायर की थी.

इसी महाशय को भारत की मीडिया Imminent Jurist कहती है. तो आप बताएं कि यह Imminent Jurist कितना ब्राह्मणवादी और जातिवादी है.

URL - OBC Admissions Case Referred to CJI for Posting Before Another Bench http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2300060.ece

Note - Later on OBC reservation case was again refereed to it's original bench, bench of Justice Ravindran and Patnayak, and judgement come in the favor of reservation on August 2011

I hate you like a love you. Romantic song between ABVP-AISA-NSUI-SFI: हम तुमसे नफ़रत करतें है जैसे हम तुमसे प्यार करते हैं

Our UGBM started at 11Am on September 20, 2011, KV Ground and ended at 1.30AM on September 20, 2011, on the issue of conduct JNUSU election. It was going on very smoothly but after dinner brake, when people going sit together for GMB, the ABVP-AISA-NSUI-SFI come up at chair that they want to adjourned the GBM. They tried to force the chair to stop the GBM, for no valid reason.


Suddenly activists from AIBSF and others, realized there motive and come up there and stopped their undemocratic attempt, and saved JNU's tradition and ethos of democracy. Shefalika (AISA), Sucheta (AISA), and Roshan (SFI) said that we have no respect of JNUSU constitution. When we all progressive and democratic forces said that our constitution can not be let happen these kinds of undemocratic activities, and chair should must refer to JNUSU constitution to tackle this matter. Then chair refereed JNUSU constitution that the GBM can be called off by chair by simple majority if one request with 10% of present students. Chair asked have you 10% of student in favor of your this request? Then Sucheta, Shefalika, Vismay each from AISA and Roshan, Anand etch from SFI, Sandhu, Manoranjan NSUI .... those who were present there had no answer. They were surprised by seeing democratic ethos of students even by new students. Instead of respecting the democratic culture, sprite and ethos, they were started disturbing the UGBM. Then chair requested that those who do not want to GBM should leave from here and let other to participate those who want to participate. They leaved from that place and we  should happy that only 4-5% of students were moved with them including their office bearer!

Above parties are claiming themselves a democratic. They mean by democracy that only they have right to speak and their ideas are only correct ideas, even other have no right to speak. They bring proposal that UGBM should be called off because they think so. Even they walkout from UGBM, which is which is highest decision making body.

They wanted to call off GBM because -

I got call from Supreme Court Judge - Sandhu NSUI, first statement

My lawyer got call from Supreme Court Judge - Sandhu, second statement

I got call from Solicitor General Gopal Subrahmanam - Sandhu, NSUI, third statement

Some student, SFI .. AISA got call - Sandhu, NSUI, forth statement

SFT got call - Sucheta, AISA, first statement

I also got call - Sucheta, AISA, second statement

I got call - Raushan, SFI, forst statement

Some of us got call - Roushan, SFI, second statement

Joint Struggle Committee got call - Roushan, third statement

They got call, we are agree for election even under Lyngdoh - Handbill of 11.09.2011, some unknown ABVP (for me)

What was call all about? That cal call was about -

1. The Supreme Court are agree to listen our case so no need to hold UGBM.
Comment – If our voice and anger reached to supreme court then we should be happy. But question arise, is supreme court started calling to person? Even at 9PM?

2. Got call from Solicitor General Gopal Subrahmanam.
Comment – Is he still in office? In my best knowledge he resign from his post in August, 2011.

3. We can not hold, UGBM, because our lawyer called us that we will won in supreme court and case will be listed.
Comment – Is any lawyer saying that he will not won the case, after taking case in hand? Even if he is sure then, have student no right to speak, in his/her own platform? In my best knowledge JSC is changing the lawyer. Then who called? If old one then how we can believe? If believe then why we are changing? If new one then when is he appointed? Have he any nexus between judges?

4. This will against our further struggle in court.
Comment – Is JNU student so fool that they come to know that they are going to do wrong thing after calling UGBM? And how suddenly come to know at 9PM. Remember SFI wanted voting at 9PM, no matter of students right to speech. They did not successes to disrupted with like minded AISA, ABVP and NSUI.

5. Our matter is going to solve soon so why we should hold, this GBM?
Comment – Why above-mentioned organization realized this at 9PM? Is it not that they got this idea for misguiding, only after realizing that students are not in their favor?

6. Now, no meaning of holding this GBM because, this will be contradictory with our course of action in court.
Comment – How suddenly you got this idea? Is it not after realizing that students are not in your favor? Is they do not know that students have right to speak?

7. I/we got call …..
Comment – Is it not showing that either you bribed by Govt.? Or misguided by Govt? Or you have nexus with anti-democratic forces? Or It was well pre planned?

Because they have no respect of Indian Constitution so no respect for JNU constitution too. They love to bring to their (fair and) lovely Manusmrity so the Lyngdoh Commission report.

AIBSF, UDSF, DSU, PSU, SFR, YJNS, and all common students opposed this, for uphold democracy in JNU. We put resolution that we want election with only JNUSU constitution. AIBSF also demanded that we should immediately conduct the election GSCASH and all JNU Clubs.

Earth Quack and Fast by Narendra Modi: भूकंप और नरेन्द्र मोदी का उपवास

फिर से भूकंप? नर रक्त पिपाश नरेन्द्र भाई मोदी, जब खाना नहीं खायेंगे तब क्या होगा? उनका भगवान खून मांगता है, और ये भक्त है कि भूखा है? भगवान नाराज हो गए, धरती डोला दी.

मतलब अब हमें मोदी और भगवान दोनों से लड़ना होगा.

(नरेन्द्र भाई मोदी, CM, गुजरात २०११.०९.१८ से २०११.०९.२० तक सद्भावना उपवास में है, आज शाम को उत्तर भारत में भूकंप आया था.)

Our people are hunger not for a day or for few days but for centuries, and these people are doing fast? This is the the way to make a joke and blackmailing us. In my best knowledge Ambedkar, Phule, Periyar etc. never did fast.

Cost of Modi's fast is around 100 carors. Who's money is this?

कबीर, बिरसा मुंडा, शाहूजी महाराज, फुले, पेरियार, आंबेडकर, कांशीराम... इस पूरी परंपरा में उपवास-अनशन नहीं है। भरे पेट वाले खा-पीकर अघाए लोगों की परंपरा में ही उपवास का मतलब त्याग हो सकता है। मिसाल के तौर पर, गांधी और गांधी के लोगों के पास कोट और सूट थे, इसलिए उनका लंगोट पहनना त्याग माना गया। यह नाटक और ढोंग की परंपरा है। बुद्ध की परंपरा भी उपवास को महान मानने का निषेध करती है।

Tender/Bid of Indian Culture भारतीये संस्कृति का ठेका

कुछ लोगो ने संस्कृति का ठेका ले रखा है. और कहते है, की यही संस्कृति है, यही मूल्य है, यही प्रतिक है, बल्कि कहिये यही राष्ट्रीय प्रतिक है, छेड़-छाड किया तो देशद्रोह.
यार मै पूछता हूँ की इसका ठेका / टेंडर कब निलकता था? साला हमको पता कईसे नहीं चला? अगली बार हम भी टेंडर भरेंगें. कृपया सूचित करें.

Worship of Women and God: नारी की पूजा और देवता निवास

भारतीय-संस्कृति में पत्नि (नारि) के लिए पति (नर) देवता तुल्य माना गया है...देवता-पति से तात्पर्य ऐसे पुरुष से है जो कि अपनी पत्नी को सुख एवं संतुष्टि प्रदान करता है...भारतीय-संस्कृति की एक और रोचक बात यह है कि ये देवता समान पति तभी प्राप्य होते हैं, जबकि स्त्री को श्रन्गारित कर, पूजा करके (जहाँ पूजा से आशय दहेज़ है) पुरुषों को समर्पित किया जाता है...तब जाके ये पुरुष देवता बन जाते हैं...अन्यथा तो राक्षस प्रवृत्ति दर्शाते हैं (दहेज़-प्रताड़ना व घरेलू-हिंसा के आँकडें अवश्य देखें या फिर अपने आस-पास की घटनाएँ देख लें) ! इसी सन्दर्भ में एक श्लोक भी काफ़ी चर्चित है : "यत्र नार्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते रमन्ते तत्र देवता:" अर्थात् जहाँ नारियों की पूजा की जाती है, वहाँ देवता निवास करते हैं...(श्लोक मनु-स्मृति से संकलित है) ! पुनः बता दूँ कि यहाँ नारी-पूजा से तात्पर्य उनके साज़-शृंगार एवं दान से है ! आप जितनी अधिक सुंदर-कन्या एवं जितना अधिक धन दान में अथवा दहेज़ में देंगे, आपकी बहन-बेटी को उतना ही अच्छा देवता-पुरुष मिलेगा...! अब आप ही विचार करें कि दहेज़-प्रथा का मूल स्त्रोत क्या है एवं स्त्रियों के विरुद्ध दमनकारी नीतियों का उद्भव का केन्द्रा बिन्दु कहाँ है...? [1]

‎"यत्र नार्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते रमन्ते तत्र देवता:" अर्थात जहाँ पूजा की हुई अर्थात् सुंदर-सुसज्जित (सुन्दर=?) , धन-धान्य से परिपूर्ण लड़कियाँ या स्त्रियाँ रहती हैं, वहाँ देवता बनने को आतुर-बेअतुर, लड़के या पुरुष चक्कर लगाते हैं...!!!

(संभव है, यह विश्लेषण और स्रोत आपके गुरु द्रोण द्वारा नहीं बताया गया होगा.)

[1] द्वारा Satyendra Humanist https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001427102096; Posted at Group - Absolute Zero https://www.facebook.com/groups/114011658701868/ ; at 18 09 2011 01:28AM

नोट- नारी की पूजा की बात मनुस्मृति के अध्याय ३, श्लोक ५६ में कहा गया है. नारी की पूजा क्या है श्लोक ५५ में कहा गया है. आनिल